Filed under: Card of the Day | Tagged: 2004, aflac, andrew, auto, bowman, card, chrome, day, mccutchen, of, refractor, the | Leave a comment »
Card of the Day: Andrew McCutchen 2004 Bowman Chrome AFLAC Refractor Auto
Card of the Day: Justin Upton 2004 Bowman Chrome AFLAC Refractor Auto
Making A Bold Prediction
I’m going to make a very bold prediction. Someday one of the major card manufacturers will purchase a very valuable vintage card, cut it up, and insert various pieces into newer cards. The signs have been there all along and it sure wouldn’t surprise me one bit. Starting with products like TRISTAR Signa Cuts and slowly moving into more popular products like Upper Deck SP Legendary Cuts, its not uncommon to find older cards cut up and reinserted into circulation. I don’t like the idea of a company cutting up any type of card, even if its only worth one penny. I really don’t like it when they destroy modern day cards like Topps does with their Pro Debut product. There is absolutely no reason to cut up a perfectly good AFLAC autograph. Just insert the whole card. It would save a lot of time and money. Hell, I’d settle for a redemption for the entire AFLAC autograph instead of this half breed of a card.
I can’t believe Topps is doing this for a second year in a row.
Why don’t they just get it over with. The next time a T206 Honus Wagner shows up for auction, buy it, and cut it up. When does a card become more than just a card? When does it become a relic worth cutting up? What do you think the value of a T206 Honus Wagner relic would be?
Filed under: Thoughts | Tagged: 2011, aflac, cards, cut, cutting, debut, honus, pro, signatures, stop, t206, topps, up, wagner | 4 Comments »
Be Aware Of Raw AFLAC Autos
Remember when Topps would insert redemptions for their AFLAC sets in products like Bowman and Bowman Chrome? I wish they still did that. When they first starting doing it, I couldn’t believe all the hype that went along with them.
Its very important that collectors are aware of the dangers when purchasing an AFLAC autograph that wasn’t made available through a redemption. AFLAC autographs were signed with a pen that didn’t always come out so bold. Therefore many of the autographs came out thin and streaky. A lot of scammers will take a Sharpie and make the player’s signature stand out more. If you buy an AFLAC autograph and submit it for grading, its possible the grader might return it stating that it has been altered. A lot of people either love or hate James Spence, but for AFLAC autographs it might be best to get one they have looked at. Just be careful when purchasing a raw version, especially if it is of a popular player.
Thanks to the collectors over at FCB for bringing up this topic.
Filed under: Scams | Tagged: aflac, autographs, baseball, fake, prospect, rookies | 1 Comment »